Equitability Analysis of the Maximal Information Coefficient, with Comparisons
نویسندگان
چکیده
A measure of dependence is said to be equitable if it gives similar scores to equally noisy relationships of different types. Equitability is important in data exploration when the goal is to identify a relatively small set of strongest associations within a dataset as opposed to finding as many non-zero associations as possible, which often are too many to sift through. Thus an equitable statistic, such as the maximal information coefficient (MIC), can be useful for analyzing high-dimensional data sets. Here, we explore both equitability and the properties of MIC, and discuss several aspects of the theory and practice of MIC. We begin by presenting an intuition behind the equitability of MIC through the exploration of the maximization and normalization steps in its definition. We then examine the speed and optimality of the approximation algorithm used to compute MIC, and suggest some directions for improving both. Finally, we demonstrate in a range of noise models and sample sizes that MIC is more equitable than natural alternatives, such as mutual information estimation and distance correlation. ∗These authors contributed equally to this work. †These authors contributed equally to this work 1 ar X iv :1 30 1. 63 14 v2 [ cs .L G ] 1 4 A ug 2 01 3
منابع مشابه
Theoretical Foundations of Equitability and the Maximal Information Coefficient
The maximal information coefficient (MIC) is a tool for finding the strongest pairwise relationships in a data set with many variables [1]. MIC is useful because it gives similar scores to equally noisy relationships of different types. This property, called equitability, is important for analyzing high-dimensional data sets. Here we formalize the theory behind both equitability and MIC in the ...
متن کاملEquitability and MIC: an FAQ
The original paper on equitability and the maximal information coefficient (MIC) [Reshef et al., 2011] has generated much discussion and interest, and so far MIC has enjoyed use in a variety of disciplines. This document serves to provide some basic background and understanding of MIC as well as to address some of the questions raised about MIC in the literature, and to provide pointers to rele...
متن کاملEquitability, mutual information, and the maximal information coefficient.
How should one quantify the strength of association between two random variables without bias for relationships of a specific form? Despite its conceptual simplicity, this notion of statistical "equitability" has yet to receive a definitive mathematical formalization. Here we argue that equitability is properly formalized by a self-consistency condition closely related to Data Processing Inequa...
متن کاملReply to Murrell et al.: Noise matters.
The concept of statistical " equitability " plays a central role in the 2011 paper by Reshef et al. (1). Formalizing equitability first requires formalizing the notion of a " noisy functional relationship, " that is, a relationship between two real variables, X and Y, having the form Y = f ðXÞ + η; where f is a function and η is a noise term. Whether a dependence measure satisfies equi-tability...
متن کاملCleaning up the record on the maximal information coefficient and equitability.
Although we appreciate Kinney and Atwal’s interest in equitability and maximal information coefficient (MIC), we believe they misrepresent our work. We highlight a few of our main objections below. Regarding our original paper (1), Kinney and Atwal (2) state “MIC is said to satisfy not just the heuristic notion of equitability, but also the mathematical criterion of R equitability,” the latter ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- CoRR
دوره abs/1301.6314 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2013